To prepare for GMing Monsterhearts, I read a bunch of teenage drama books and watched several TV series. Here are the ones that really stood out for me:
With Monsterhearts, there is no big plot the players try to solve as a group. Instead, the story develops organically from their daily lives and struggles. There may be a rival trying to embarrass you in front of the class, or maybe a character has a crush on the boyfriend of their best friend. Or maybe your parents plan to send you to military school because of your anger issues. Take these plot points and connect them with some NPC relations and voilà, you have a plot.
The story jumps from scene to scene, with not all player characters being present all of the time. Like in many TV drama series, where a handful of main characters follows different plotlines, all of which are connected.
There is no big bad villain, whose plans the players try to thwart. The player characters are the main trouble makers here, who progress the story with their own issues. They are causing problems and conflicts because they act out of passion, malice, or insecurity. There’s a lot of grey areas here. The same character might be the nice well-behaved girl in the first row on one day, and a blood-hungry werewolf the next day, just to regret the fallout of their actions afterward.
As the topics of Monsterhearts are very delicate and personal, it’s an absolute must to use safety tools. The minimum should be to use an X-card. With this, everyone at the table can signal which topics should be skipped, because they feel uncomfortable about them. Additionally, I recommend asking players before the start of the game or campaign if any subjects are no-goes for them. With this in mind, the GM can avoid these topics in the session preparation. That’s easier than having to shut down a plot point during the session and having to improvise a new one on the fly.
While I prefer Monsterhearts to be dark, angsty, and full of conflicts between the player characters, there are several other possible ways to enjoy the game. Some Monsterhearts campaigns have an external threat or villain the players need to team up against. Or maybe you want to add a longer investigative part to it, like a conspiracy the player characters need to uncover. Monsterhearts can also be played in a variety of different settings beyond the traditional contemporary high school. Imagine a boarding school, a summer camp, or even a Lovecraftian campaign in 1920s Kingsport, you name it. Make it your game and pick whatever style you and your players like best.
Teenage angst is the topic at which Monsterhearts really shines. It comes with different facets, such as uncontrolled anger, a feeling of loneliness, extreme dependency on others, etc. These emotions are usually inner struggles that a character must face. In order to create conflicts, drama, and plot hooks, you need to make them visible and tangible between the players. To facilitate this, Avery created playbooks revolving around these emotional issues. Here are some examples:
The Werewolf is all about anger issues. She wants to assert dominance as the most physically strong student in the class, as well as establish and defend her territory. She won’t accept others challenging her status and if her inner monster takes over, she’ll respond with violence. A lot of violence.
The Ghost is about being ignored and overlooked. With his shy personality, he’s struggling to have others notice him and win their affection. But the harder he tries, the more he’s distancing himself from others. Until his inner monster makes him hurt others to get their attention.
All the playbooks translate a certain aspect of teenage angst into pure escalation. What a brilliant mechanic to arrange for drama in the game! And it’s also beautifully interwoven with the game’s setting of teenage urban fantasy. This is what makes Monsterhearts so outstanding. Somebody give Avery a medal.
Because of everything I said before and because I like the teenage high school drama setting. It’s a very specific cosmos, and there aren’t a lot of pen and paper RPGs out there doing as fine a job as Monsterhearts.
I enjoy Monsterhearts’ focus on conflicts and dilemmas.
I can relate to a lot of the teenage angst issues covered in the game, because I had a difficult time too back then. And I do like the bleed and awkwardness that result from this.
Shortly before reading the Monsterhearts pdf, I watched “13 Reasons Why” which I really enjoyed.
It was my first PBTA game and it massively change my GMing style. To be honest, I had to read it three times and experience it as a player once, before I fully understood how it works. But then it really clicked. Sharing narration rights is incredibly cool in Monsterhearts. And as a GM, without a fixed plot, I get surprised by dice rolls or choices the players make and their effects on the plot.
There’s just one tiny point of negative feedback from me: The images and layout of the book don’t really match the high quality of the overall system. I do like the few illustrations that are in the book, but I would love to see five times as many. I guess it’s because Monsterhearts is an indie system, which just does not yield enough budget for more illustrations. Okay, I can live with that. A great game with only a few images is better than a terrible game with fantastic illustrations.
A – You need a special group of players to make it work
You will need to be looking for players who are interested in this teenage high school drama setting. Usually this means players who are 30+ years old. For younger players, Monsterhearts is often “too close to home,” meaning not enough years have passed since their time in high school to make it interesting for them. Additionally, you need players interested in having control of the narrative and having fun with actively shaping the story instead of only experiencing it (which is true for all PBTA games).
I also found that the players should be familiar with each other. Diving into the emotional topics of Monsterhearts requires a fair amount of trust between the players, which is usually lacking, if they haven’t played a game with each other before (e.g. at conventions).
B – It’s not a game for one-shots
Monsterhearts is ideally played over three to six sessions. The first session is for generating characters and the setting. The second session is a test run. It’s the third session where Monsterhearts really uses its full potential, when you can develop the story based on the players’ actions and decisions from the session before.
I had to learn this the hard way. I did two convention games with Monsterhearts and tried to cram in character and setting generation as well as three hours of play into a five-hour slot. Those five hours were way too short for the players to get used to their characters and at the same time develop a player-driven story. We did have drama, but it felt forced by the plot and did not feel as authentic as when built up over a session or two.
I love Monsterhearts, both as a player and as a GM. Yes, it is a very specific setting for a small target audience. But if you and your group are into emotional drama, conflicts between players, and the high school setting, paired with a bit of urban fantasy, I absolutely recommend giving Monsterhearts a try. It’s an absolute gem and my favorite RPG system of 2019 and 2020.
Browse our recent posts ⏶
1 thought on “Why my heart beats for Monsterhearts”
Yay, Avery tweeted my review yesterday: https://twitter.com/lackingceremony/status/1311507659971940352
Check out Avery’s twitter profile for updates on her amazing games: